Teams

Venable/MH/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-28vs Roehrenbeck/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Goolsby / Donna Hoffmann vs Carolyn Bakalekos / Judith Dugan4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Kathy Henson / Brenda Horne4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColleen Justus / Sharon Thompson vs Becky Arthur / Melanie Riley1-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs Joslin/Bella Vista/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Goolsby / Donna Hoffmann vs Barbara Johnson / Sandy Stursma4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Venable / Nancy Decker vs Marsha Taylor / Vickie Adkins0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesColleen Justus / Carolyn Kelley vs Leslie Jones / Tammy Waddell4-6, 1-6
2024-09-28vs Wisdom/FS/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Liza Holman / Frances Morreale6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Goolsby / Donna Hoffmann vs Janice Wisdom / Jeannette Falkner6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Kelley / Sharon Thompson vs Judy Boreham / Glenda Weigand0-6, 0-6
2024-09-27vs Dickson/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Justus / Carolyn Kelley vs Mary Bennett / Beth Gieringer Mcwha2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Hoffmann / Debbie Goolsby vs Mindy Morrell / Lynnette Hannahs0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Pricilla Backus / Teresa Murphy6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Donna Hoffmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Carol Rollins
published 3.5
3.03
Nancy Decker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Phyllis Venable
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Debbie Goolsby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.88
Carolyn Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Colleen Justus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Sharon Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Decker + Phyllis Venable15955% games+4.4% vs expected
Colleen Justus + Sharon Thompson2341% games+1.4% vs expected
Donna Hoffmann + Debbie Goolsby134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Hoffmann
57W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Rollins
37W–43L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Nancy Decker
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Phyllis Venable
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Debbie Goolsby
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Carolyn Kelley
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Colleen Justus
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Thompson
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.