Teams

IGRaschke

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-02vs RWalter 8.5 18+ RRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Hoyle / Graham Schillmoller vs Bradford Aron / Robert Whitehurst6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Troxell / Lawrence Brock vs Ryan Walter / Hank McCullough6-0, 6-4
2022-09-25vs MLaddWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Troxell / Lawrence Brock vs Jason Sage / Matthew Short6-3, 6-4
2022-09-18vs IGJimenezWon 10
W#3 DoublesLawrence Brock / Michael Hoyle vs Brian Soltz / Eric Hilpert6-3, 7-5
2022-08-28vs DFarmer 18+ 8.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJon Davis / Preston Waldo vs Zach Rocha / Gregory Isabwa7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Troxell / Lawrence Brock vs Michael Zurawel / Christopher MacK6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGraham Schillmoller / Andrew Schuett vs Brent Nieri / Jeremy Alston4-6, 3-6
2022-08-21vs JVanDeWater(18+ Combo)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSam Williams / Preston Waldo vs Matthew Presser / Jeff Plemmons6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Troxell / Lawrence Brock vs Trey Coomes / Scott Schwartz6-3, 6-2
2022-08-14vs SLlewellyn 8.5 CAPWon 10
W#1 DoublesPreston Waldo / Sam Williams vs Andrew Perdue / Benjamin Fortich7-5, 6-1
2022-08-07vs SWingoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPreston Waldo / Andrew Schuett vs Davis Humphries / Sean Heuser4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Troxell / Lawrence Brock vs Nile Testerman / Nick Cox6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Troxell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
Graham Schillmoller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Tate
published 4
3.80
Andrew Schuett
published 4
3.78
Preston Waldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Howard Critcher
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Brock + Graham Schillmoller472159% games+2.3% vs expected
Andrew Tate + Preston Waldo6256% games+1.1% vs expected
Lawrence Brock + Adam Troxell22265% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Brock + Preston Waldo6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Troxell
34W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Graham Schillmoller
170W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Andrew Tate
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Andrew Schuett
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Preston Waldo
145W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Howard Critcher
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.