Teams

Deedy, Judith

2022 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-19vs Mowery, ShellySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Deedy / Patricia Paisner vs Hether Lytton / Lauren Lawrence6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Schenken / Marcia Ciacco vs Christine Abraham / Amy Funk6-4, 6-3
2021-12-12vs Vasta, PennieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcia Ciacco / Cynthia Schenken vs Edgy Sack / Sibley Frye2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Paisner / Mary Beth Tudas vs Mary Anne Kucera / Mindy Smith4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-12-05vs Klein, KimLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudith Deedy / Patricia Paisner vs Vanessa Alpert / Polly Breitenkamp2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Arthur / Janette Santizo vs Kim Klein / Diane Phillips0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Schenken / Mary Beth Tudas vs Cindy Newby / Christine Stannard6-2, 7-5
2021-11-21vs Norgren, JuliannaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary McBride / Sarah Gladstone vs Julianna Norgren / Marcella Prock6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanette Santizo / Mary Beth Tudas vs Christy Sykes / Jennifer Loe7-6, 6-1
2021-11-14vs Day, ElizabethWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Deedy / Mary McBride vs Kathy Hodge / Elizabeth Day6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarcia Ciacco / Cynthia Schenken vs Michelle Robinson / Tamela Yoder1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanette Santizo / Patricia Paisner vs Nisha Joseph / Jen O'Connor6-2, 6-0
2021-11-07vs Muller, SonyaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary McBride / Patricia Paisner vs Caroline Freebairn / Courtney Marsh4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Gladstone / Janette Santizo vs Michele Gomez / Sabrina Alexander6-4, 6-4
2021-10-24vs Davenport, PhoebeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudith Deedy / Mary McBride vs Beverly Elving / Pam Dunaway6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Tudas / Cynthia Schenken vs Caitlin Tibbs / Kelly Burnham0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Arthur / Janette Santizo vs Jennifer Liebenthal / Diane Strahl5-7, 3-6
2021-10-17vs Latta, KristineSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary McBride / Mary Beth Tudas vs Karen Evans / Amanda Martin3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Ciacco / Judith Deedy vs Anna Allen / Galina Bulgakova6-2, 6-2
2021-10-10vs Schwabauer, KellyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcia Ciacco / Cynthia Schenken vs Margarida Kessens / Bethani Suter1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanette Santizo / Sarah Gladstone vs Amy Ellzey / Kim Ulowetz3-6, 1-6
2021-10-03vs Crawford, JanetLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Tudas / Patricia Paisner vs Natalie Gillaspie / Catherine Boone3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Deedy / Sarah Gladstone vs Kenda Caskey / Kim Pulford4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Muller, Sonya9122823225
2Vasta, Pennie82201024220
3Schwabauer, Kelly73181227209
4Klein, Kim73181231248
5Crawford, Janet64181224220
6Davenport, Phoebe64171330252
7Mowery, Shelly46111943305
8Deedy, Judith37121838274
9Norgren, Julianna28111940290
10Latta, Kristine2892145300
11Day, Elizabeth1982246300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Sarah Gladstone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Janette Santizo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Judith Deedy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Mary Beth Tudas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cynthia Schenken
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Amanda Lambright
published
Jenny Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marcia Ciacco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Thornberry
published
Patricia Paisner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Tudas + Patricia Paisner21032% games+1.0% vs expected
Judith Deedy + Sarah Gladstone4548% games−0.3% vs expected
Sarah Gladstone + Janette Santizo4843% games−3.3% vs expected
Marcia Ciacco + Cynthia Schenken41236% games−3.9% vs expected
Megan Thornberry + Amanda Lambright4349% gamesnot enough data
Janette Santizo + Jenny Arthur3349% gamesnot enough data
Judith Deedy + Patricia Paisner044 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Ciacco + Jenny Arthur134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Gladstone
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Janette Santizo
23W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Judith Deedy
14W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
Mary Beth Tudas
11W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.34
2.5
Cynthia Schenken
13W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Amanda Lambright
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenny Arthur
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcia Ciacco
8W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Thornberry
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Paisner
16W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.