Teams

EFuguet.55C-DFC

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 7:00 PM
Hardscrabble
Sep 17 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 19 4:00 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
2026-08-27vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarl Laird / Neill Goslin vs Mark Bland / Adam Strom1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEvan Fuguet / Matthew Feldt vs CHARLES ENDERLINE / Dan Tudor4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Rust / Brian Reo vs Randy Cubrilovic / Eric Vance1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-20vs MHolt-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn StClair / Rick Edmunds vs Michael Holt / David Evert3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Feldt / Adam Rust vs Scott Hartman / Jeff Denhard2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonald Berger / Carl Laird vs David Stefan / David Nagelhout6-2, 6-1
2026-08-18vs GGlish-CHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / John StClair vs Eric Vance / Adam Strom4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEvan Fuguet / Jeff Russell vs Charles Fisher / Timothy Buckley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarl Laird / Neill Goslin vs Bill Stewart / Gary Glish6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EFuguet.55C-DFC1021225
2MHolt-DUR1021325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Neill Goslin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
John StClair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Donald Berger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Adam Rust
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Brian Reo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Matthew Feldt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Evan Fuguet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
STUART KNECHTLE
published
2.87
Carl Laird
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeff Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

STUART KNECHTLE + Brian Reo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neill Goslin
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
John StClair
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Donald Berger
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Adam Rust
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Brian Reo
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Matthew Feldt
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
3.5
Evan Fuguet
17W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
STUART KNECHTLE
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Jeff Russell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.