Teams

Grip N Rip

2025 3.0 Flex · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-08vs The RacketeersLost 12
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Rahul Singh6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTrevor Nelson vs Peter Ratcliffe0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKahlil Saad vs Samuel Thornberry4-6, 5-7
2025-05-01vs The RacketeersLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs Rahul Singh2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKahlil Saad vs Cody O'brien0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRizwan Nasir vs Samuel Thornberry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs The RacketeersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTrevor Nelson vs Rahul Singh0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs Cody O'brien6-1, 6-1
2025-04-17vs The RacketeersWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Rahul Singh7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs Peter Ratcliffe6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesKahlil Saad vs ABDULLA NAIM6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-10vs The RacketeersWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Cody O'brien6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRizwan Nasir vs ABDULLA NAIM3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKahlil Saad vs Samuel Thornberry6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-03vs The RacketeersWon 21
W#1 SinglesNicolas Maderafont vs Peter Ratcliffe6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAnand Vennavelli vs ABDULLA NAIM6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTrevor Nelson vs Cody O'brien6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Anand Vennavelli
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Trevor Nelson
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.27
Kahlil Saad
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Nicolas Maderafont
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rizwan Nasir
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kahlil Saad + Anand Vennavelli224 matchesnot enough data
Anand Vennavelli + Trevor Nelson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anand Vennavelli
30W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Trevor Nelson
18W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Kahlil Saad
6W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
Nicolas Maderafont
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rizwan Nasir
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.