Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-El Fuego

2023 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoy Miya / Lynn Hepperly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-18vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Berceau / Tejaswini Vaidya vs Hannah Galbreath / Lauren Griswold4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Hepperly / Remi Turley vs Stephanie Favila / Stephanie Morris4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRaquel Huamani / Alicia Miller vs Holli Allred / Jill Raemisch2-6, 2-6
2023-03-11vs Salt Lake Tennis-WrightLost 12
W#1 DoublesTejaswini Vaidya / Lynn Hepperly vs Diana Vogel / Kristin Midyett6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKrisann Humphreys / Teresa Hatter vs Jackie Condie / Candace Haroldsen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRemi Turley / Shelly Kaihatu vs Ashley Wright / Pat Williams6-7, 2-5
2023-03-04vs Liberty Park Tennis-Soffe/LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Berceau / Krisann Humphreys vs Dailee Gardner / Annaliese Gardner5-7, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Kaihatu / Alicia Miller vs Ann Monroy / Paula Kremser1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesClare Valles / Tejaswini Vaidya vs Kimberly Chytraus / Alisa Kesler6-3, 6-2
2023-02-25vs Liberty Park Tennis-Olson/MasseyWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Hepperly / Alicia Miller vs Liz Baucom / Liz Bell1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRaquel Huamani / Krisann Humphreys vs Angela Fletcher / Teresa Jackson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMegan Berceau / Remi Turley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesTrena Anderson / Alicia Miller vs Andie Ranck / Madison Milligan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Hepperly / Remi Turley vs Kristin Johnson / Hailey Jensen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClare Valles / Tejaswini Vaidya vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-04vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Hepperly / Krisann Humphreys vs Lauren Griswold / Jill Raemisch3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesClare Valles / Raquel Huamani vs Holli Allred / Olivia Moreton6-2, 5-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoy Miya / Teresa Hatter vs Annie Mortensen / Anne MacKey1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-WrightWon 21
L#1 DoublesTrena Anderson / Shelly Kaihatu vs Candace Haroldsen / Pat Williams7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoy Miya / Megan Berceau vs Michaela Riding / Morgan Hansen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlicia Miller / Raquel Huamani vs Jackie Condie / Diana Vogel6-7, 5-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5W Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Soffe/Love5212921163
2Liberty Park Tennis-El Fuego53141022154
3Liberty Park Tennis-Olson/Massey4313818138
4Eccles Tennis Center-Callister/Danck1732142246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Megan Berceau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Lynn Hepperly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Tejaswini Vaidya
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Krisann Humphreys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Clare Valles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Shelly Kaihatu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Trena Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Teresa Hatter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joy Miya
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Raquel Huamani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Remi Turley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Hepperly + Krisann Humphreys5455% games+7.4% vs expected
Megan Berceau + Lynn Hepperly9457% games+5.7% vs expected
Lynn Hepperly + Shelly Kaihatu6351% games+2.9% vs expected
Shelly Kaihatu + Trena Anderson2838% games−3.7% vs expected
Megan Berceau + Shelly Kaihatu0539% games−4.1% vs expected
Joy Miya + Shelly Kaihatu4256% gamesnot enough data
Joy Miya + Clare Valles1443% gamesnot enough data
Trena Anderson + Krisann Humphreys4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Megan Berceau
71W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Lynn Hepperly
58W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Tejaswini Vaidya
34W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Krisann Humphreys
26W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Clare Valles
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelly Kaihatu
36W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Trena Anderson
40W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Teresa Hatter
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Joy Miya
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Raquel Huamani
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Remi Turley
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.