Teams

LWGoodwin/NMP 3.0 Thurs 55+

2023 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs LKPO-Powell/WestportLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beatty / Sandra Dickinson vs Ann Murphy / Mary Clare Hainsworth0-6, 3-6
2023-04-20vs LSFalcone/RIver RunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Sandra Dickinson vs Shelly Brock / Cathie Loveless6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Turley / Sheila Hebert vs Brenda Forouzad / Beth Schleck6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-30vs LKPO-Powell/WestportWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Wendy Goodwin vs Pam Barbagli / Carrie Davin6-3, 6-1
2023-03-23vs LSFalcone/RIver RunLost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy Goodwin / Katherine Karnatz vs Susan Falcone / Shelly Brock2-6, 3-6
2023-03-14vs LSFalcone/RIver RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Turley / Sheila Hebert vs Beth Schleck / Brenda Forouzad6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Kathy Murphy vs Barbara Stoner / Susan Sanders6-3, 6-4
2023-03-09vs LKPO-Powell/WestportWon 20
W#2 DoublesCorrine Rupp / Lisa Turley vs Marilou Martin / Mary Clare Hainsworth6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Karnatz / Leslie Shaw vs Shirley Pirkl / Bernadette Bender4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Katherine Karnatz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Sheila Hebert
published
3.04
Lisa Bograd
published 3
3.00
Tammy Fisher
published
2.97
Lisa Turley
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Kathy Murphy
published
2.83
Leslie Shaw
published
2.83
Kathy Dorr
published
Barbara Beatty
published 3
2.64
Sandra Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Wendy Goodwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Hebert + Lisa Turley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–171L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Sheila Hebert
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Lisa Bograd
103W–60L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Tammy Fisher
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Lisa Turley
116W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kathy Murphy
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Leslie Shaw
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Kathy Dorr
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Barbara Beatty
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Sandra Dickinson
35W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
Wendy Goodwin
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.