Teams

Nesbit Lakes (Gina Shirmeyer)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Lisa Ray)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-21vs Atlanta AC (Patty Sweeney)*Won 20
W#2 DoublesGina Shirmeyer / KENYA GREEN vs Patricia Barron / Karen Gipson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Lamont / Lisa Burns vs Dee Dee Holmquist / Kathy Strickland6-2, 6-1
2026-06-23vs The Manor (Mali Hu)*Lost 03
L#1 SinglesTerri Hartley vs Leticia Fernandez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Kabealo / Vanessa Anderson-goldwire vs April Marler / Emily Parsons2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesHeather Rice / Lisa Burns vs Patrice Chishom / Angela Yu-Norris2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (Lisa Ray) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Fabienne Boy
published
3.19
Caroline Joey Seton
published 3.5
2.88
Gina Shirmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
KENYA GREEN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Terri Hartley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Meagan Galle
published
2.60
Kym Golden
published
2.36
Alison Kabealo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Lisa Burns
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Becky Lamont
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katy Humphrey
published
Leslie Genske
published
Lisa Sharp
published
Yara Parada-Aguirre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Burns + Becky Lamont123 matchesnot enough data
Terri Hartley + KENYA GREEN213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fabienne Boy
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Caroline Joey Seton
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Gina Shirmeyer
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
KENYA GREEN
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Terri Hartley
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Meagan Galle
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Kym Golden
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Alison Kabealo
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
Lisa Burns
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Becky Lamont
4W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Katy Humphrey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Genske
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Sharp
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yara Parada-Aguirre
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.