Teams

Preston/Brewer

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Paul Preston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gus Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2025-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Best / Paul Preston vs John Brady / Umang Patel6-3, 6-0
2025-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Kerry Griffin vs Brian Chenoweth / Kip Stevenson6-1, 6-3
2025-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesGus Johnson / Paul Preston vs JUN KYU PARK / Jinhong Shin6-2, 6-4
2025-07-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Best / Gus Johnson vs Brian Chenoweth / Scott Soot7-5, 6-2
2025-07-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Best / Kerry Griffin vs John Brady / Umang Patel6-4, 6-2
2025-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGus Johnson / Douglas Brewer vs Jared Rollier / Thomas Griffin6-2, 6-4
2025-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Douglas Brewer vs Scott Dickinson / Jason Floyd6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Paul Preston
31W–41L career
0%76%24%
3.00
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
Gus Johnson
37W–29L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.