Teams

KTC-Linhardt

2022 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 5.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-14vs QRRC-WilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesVeronica Smallwood / Bianca Riley vs Daphne Warner / Valerie Wood7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-24vs QRRC-HornLost 12
W#1 DoublesShayna McConville / Veronica Smallwood vs Johnna Chamberlain / Anita Mischuk6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesColleen McDonald / Bianca Riley vs Deborah Whitcomb / Casey Gill1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Napier / Michelle Johansen vs Lauren Moorman / Lauren Keeley0-6, 0-6
2022-07-17vs FSSC-BagleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam Linhardt / Veronica Smallwood vs Casey Bagley / Tessa Gerberick7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen McDonald / Bianca Riley vs Sarah Hedrick / Nicole Armitage2-6, 4-6
2022-07-10vs QRRC-HornLost 12
W#1 DoublesVeronica Smallwood / Sam Linhardt vs Amy Smith / Allison Swanson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Bondy / Colleen McDonald vs Casey Gill / Maggie Keefe3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Jumer / Michelle Johansen vs Laura Horn / Johnna Chamberlain0-6, 0-6
2022-06-26vs QRRC-WilliamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSam Linhardt / Veronica Smallwood vs Ailing Weng / Darlene Williams7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Thompson / Shilpa Goel vs TOMOKO WELDE / Valerie Wood1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMorgan Napier / Elom Dossa vs Daphne Warner / Edel Jesse0-6, 0-6
2022-06-19vs FSSC-BagleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Bondy / Shayna McConville vs Dana Blanton / Sarah Bryan6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShilpa Goel / Bianca Riley vs Kelsey Schuering / Emily Turner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElom Dossa / Michelle Johansen vs Ayanna Archie / Jessica Stickel2-6, 3-6
2022-06-12vs QRRC-WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Riley / Julia Thompson vs Ailing Weng / Cheryl Silcox6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnnie Ligibel / Veronica Smallwood vs Daphne Warner / Debra Fazio6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSam Linhardt / Colleen McDonald vs Melissa Litteral / TOMOKO WELDE3-6, 5-7
2022-06-05vs QRRC-HornLost 03
L#1 DoublesBianca Riley / Julia Thompson vs Nancy Eben / Deborah Whitcomb4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Ligibel / Veronica Smallwood vs Maggie Keefe / Casey Gill6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSam Linhardt / Colleen McDonald vs Lauren Moorman / Laura Horn3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-22vs FSSC-BagleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSam Linhardt / Shayna McConville vs Casey Bagley / Erin Armitage3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShilpa Goel / Annie Ligibel vs Dana Blanton / Nicole Armitage6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesColleen McDonald / Morgan Napier vs Marcela Mancilla de Jordan / Emily Turner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Veronica Smallwood
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.99
Sam Linhardt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Annie Ligibel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Shayna McConville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Bianca Riley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.15
Elom Dossa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Colleen McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin Jumer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Johansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Napier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shilpa Goel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Linhardt + Shayna McConville9262% games+13.3% vs expected
Annie Ligibel + Shilpa Goel3263% games+4.1% vs expected
Sam Linhardt + Veronica Smallwood5452% games+0.6% vs expected
Bianca Riley + Shilpa Goel4350% gamesnot enough data
Sam Linhardt + Colleen McDonald134 matchesnot enough data
Bianca Riley + Morgan Napier123 matchesnot enough data
Annie Ligibel + Veronica Smallwood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica Smallwood
164W–32L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Sam Linhardt
115W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Annie Ligibel
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shayna McConville
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Bianca Riley
37W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Elom Dossa
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Colleen McDonald
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Jumer
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Johansen
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Morgan Napier
6W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shilpa Goel
38W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.