Teams

McDill/Nelson

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-16vs ChristensenLost 23
L#1 DoublesKelsie Hardison / Terumi DeGraw vs Lacey Hudnut / Holly Mattox3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDeborah McDill vs Sarah Chantiam6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmiera Rayyan / Sarah Egner vs Mary Ann Caputo / Allison Raetz3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesErinn Wilkins vs Emily Lankhorst0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Leeds / Susan Messersmith vs Brenda Christensen / Samantha Roberts6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs KoertenWon 31
W#1 DoublesMallory Cranwell / Beth Tourek vs Eleanore Tiehen / Trish Weekly6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerumi DeGraw / Jessica Winter vs Anne Koerten / Kate McGee6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSarah Sindelar vs Jane Mcgarel6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Leeds / Sarah Egner vs Laura Deck / Breann Meisinger3-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs RaikesLost 23
W#1 DoublesStephanie Nelson / Deborah McDill vs Suzanne MacAulay / Erin Giannangelo6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBeth Tourek vs Suzie Fogarty6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmiera Rayyan / Sarah Egner vs Billie Dixon / Michelle Clark4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesErinn Wilkins vs Sarah Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMallory Cranwell / Sarah Macksey vs Erin Foley / Candace Huebert1-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs ChristensenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Sindelar / Beth Tourek vs Anna Miner / Allison Raetz6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah McDill vs Sarah Chantiam6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Winter / Kelsie Hardison vs Mary Ann Caputo / Tara Shields0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerumi DeGraw / Susan Messersmith vs Samantha Roberts / Brenda Christensen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-12vs KoertenLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmiera Rayyan / Kelsie Hardison vs Eleanore Tiehen / Laura Deck4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Sindelar vs Deana Klein6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah McDill / Stephanie Nelson vs Breann Meisinger / Corie Barnard6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJessica Winter vs Kate McGee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErinn Wilkins / Sarah Macksey vs Anne Koerten / Trish Weekly0-6, 1-6
2025-05-05vs RaikesLost 13
L#1 DoublesBeth Tourek / Sarah Egner vs Michelle Clark / Suzanne MacAulay5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMallory Cranwell / Kelsie Hardison vs Candace Huebert / Sarah Konigsberg3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDeborah McDill vs Billie Dixon6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTerumi DeGraw / Susan Messersmith vs Abbie Raikes / Erin Giannangelo2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raikes51181229239
2McDill/Nelson24151535261
3Koerten24121839279
4Holland0642653344

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
April Obermier
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 19% · published 3.5
3.19
Sarah Sindelar
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.13
Beth Tourek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Jessica Winter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.97
Deborah McDill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.85
Kelsie Hardison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Sarah Egner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Amiera Rayyan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Terumi DeGraw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Erinn Wilkins
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Laura Leeds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Cranwell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Macksey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Messersmith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah McDill + April Obermier224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah McDill + Sarah Sindelar123 matchesnot enough data
Deborah McDill + Beth Tourek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
April Obermier
39W–28L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.62
Sarah Sindelar
20W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Beth Tourek
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jessica Winter
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Deborah McDill
58W–47L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Kelsie Hardison
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
Sarah Egner
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amiera Rayyan
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terumi DeGraw
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Erinn Wilkins
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Leeds
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Cranwell
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Macksey
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Messersmith
1W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.