Teams

Willliamson-CORTA

2025 CORTA 55 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championships · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs GA/Barry OwenLost 03
L#1 DoublesWesley Williamson / Tonya McLemore vs Charles Gilmore / Neeve Owen2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRamon Davis / Teresa Wiggins vs Barry Owen / Kelly Roberts2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Caraveo / Antonio Hamilton vs Jeff Barnes / Lawanna Chang1-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs Jung-CORTALost 12
W#1 DoublesBrad Brooks / Tonya McLemore vs Todd Lee / Sherry Phillips6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAntonio Hamilton / Stephanie Caraveo vs Kerry Philip Baker / Melissa Foy0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWesley Williamson / Mary Coyle vs Ramon Scott / Suzanne Burbelo4-6, 5-7
2025-03-22vs GA/Barry OwenLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrad Brooks / Mary Coyle vs Barry Owen / Stacy Sorrow1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAntonio Hamilton / Tonya McLemore vs Charles Gilmore / Kelly Roberts2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRamon Davis / Teresa Wiggins vs Ken Ellinger / Neeve Owen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GA/Barry Owen3184986
2Jung-CORTA2154980
3Willliamson-CORTA032716103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Wesley Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Tonya McLemore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Paige Penner
published
3.63
Mary Coyle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Brad Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Stephanie Caraveo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Antonio Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Lynne Williamson
published
3.40
Teresa Wiggins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ramon Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wesley Williamson
32W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Tonya McLemore
32W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Paige Penner
33W–53L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mary Coyle
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Brad Brooks
45W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Stephanie Caraveo
40W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Antonio Hamilton
16W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Lynne Williamson
86W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Teresa Wiggins
14W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Ramon Davis
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.