Teams

TSherburne

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Seb Heese
published
3.77
Ted Sherburne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Mike Hennen
published
3.66
Penn Holderness
published
3.60
Lloyd Brown
published
3.48
John Markham
published
3.43
John Vander Vennet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Tyler Heath
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seb Heese
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Ted Sherburne
148W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Mike Hennen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Penn Holderness
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lloyd Brown
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.60
John Markham
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
John Vander Vennet
81W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Tyler Heath
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.