Teams

RL 40+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-20vs Turner/Munshell 3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesGlen Hardesty / Matt Baumann vs Niraj Jani / Phillip Harvin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Williams / Kevin Ro vs Tim Munshell / Andy Blocker6-3, 6-4
2022-06-27vs META 3.5 40+Won 20
W#2 DoublesGlen Hardesty / Kevin Ro vs Steven Gibau / Jon Roll7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJason Baumann / Matt Baumann vs Antonio Ferreira / Raymond Barry6-3, 6-2
2022-06-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Williams / Glen Hardesty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs KG 3.5 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGlen Hardesty / Christopher Williams vs Michael Barnello / James Forbes1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Baumann / Peter Hong vs Jay Anzures / Maunank Shah0-6, 5-7
2022-05-21vs Aceholes 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Baumann / Glen Hardesty vs Doug Strong / Bruce Knolmayer1-6, 6-7
2022-05-10vs Get the Point Started 3.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Glen Hardesty vs Mark Leach / Jeffrey Kassman7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Matt Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Glen Hardesty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Walt Rhee
published
Christopher Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Peter Hong
published
2.84
Kevin Ro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Hardesty + Christopher Williams5551% gamesnot enough data
Glen Hardesty + Matt Baumann5358% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Williams + Matt Baumann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Matt Baumann
225W–179L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Glen Hardesty
85W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Walt Rhee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Hong
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.