Teams

WHRC-Jennings

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Michael Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Richard Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Potter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Todd Khozein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Tracey Hodgson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Skip Potter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Wendy Nakatani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Pamela Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Sara Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-12-03Split 11
L#1 DoublesSara Weinstein / Todd Khozein vs Ericka Nelson / Michael Arellano6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Hughes / Richard Jennings vs Kimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-02Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Todd Khozein vs Sara Crate / Devin McMasters6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSkip Potter / Jennifer Potter vs Kayla Casebeer / Jesse Inkpen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Michael Meyers vs Jeri Finn / Richard Sohn6-0, 6-1
2023-11-19Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Richard Jennings vs Kimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Michael Meyers vs Nina Hanson / Keith Main6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Nakatani / Todd Khozein vs Ariana White / Jered Cuenco3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-11Split 11
W#1 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Richard Jennings vs Victoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Weinstein / Todd Khozein vs Paul OHollaren / Megan Mandel6-2, 6-3
2023-10-29Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Potter / Skip Potter vs Donna Baxter / Ray Baxter7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Richard Jennings vs Vicki Blunt / Charles Hahn6-2, 7-5
2023-10-27Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Todd Khozein vs Dolores Corley / James Takahashi7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Eldridge / Richard Jennings vs TRIET NGUYEN / THAO VAN6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Mark Cooper vs Michelle Vo / Tri Pham6-0, 6-1
2023-10-22Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracey Hodgson / Todd Khozein vs Tony Chennault / Cecile Bamer6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Hughes / Richard Jennings vs Kevin Sullivan / Julie Arness6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Michael Meyers vs Craig Mcreary / Kathryn Harlan6-3, 6-3
2023-09-29Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Richard Jennings vs Shari Levelle / Saril Valiyaparambil6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Lowthian / Michael Meyers vs Timothea Barnatan / Sam Ko6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Potter / Skip Potter vs Cathy Gatzke / Cary Gatzke6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michael Meyers
0W–10L career
not enough data
3.5
Richard Jennings
40W–66L career
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Potter
38W–53L career
2%98%1%
3.24
3.5
Todd Khozein
52W–61L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3.5
Tracey Hodgson
29W–34L career · type A
19%81%0%
3.10
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3
Skip Potter
43W–73L career
0%79%21%
3.00
3.5
Wendy Nakatani
30W–41L career
36%64%0%
3.00
3
Pamela Hughes
22W–36L career
0%92%8%
2.92
3
Sara Weinstein
12W–27L career
1%98%1%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.