Teams

Da.McNeill40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-09vs Sh.Lav40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Bill Green vs Mark Uttridge / Philip Gugliotta6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLarry Essary / Cameron Burch vs Michael Shaw / Omar EL-Kaissi6-2, 6-0
2024-10-08vs Sp.Huffstetler40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / David Kelly vs Randy Poteat / William Smith1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Essary / Kevin Hampton vs Michael Ciuffo / Spence Huffstetler6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-10-04vs Br.Lamm40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Cameron Burch vs Scott Andersen / Alex Radulovic6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLarry Essary / Ian Campbell vs Brent Lamm / Samir Naik7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-25vs Sp.Huffstetler40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / David Kelly vs Michael Ciuffo / David Clark0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Cameron Burch vs Paul Shuey / Aaron Earwood6-0, 6-2
2024-09-11vs St.Wingo40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Chaffin / David Kelly vs Robert Marriott / Anthony Womack6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLarry Essary / Kevin Hampton vs Barrett Rankin / Kevin Manweiler7-6, 6-2
2024-09-04vs Da.Huffman40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Bill Green vs Bill Francis / John Perry6-2, 7-5
2024-08-21vs Wi.Mooney40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Kevin Hampton vs Andrew Tate / Preston Waldo1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Bill Green vs Lawrence Brock / William Mooney6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-14vs Br.Lamm40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Kevin Hampton vs Pedro Loaiza / Samir Naik7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Cameron Burch
published 3.5
3.65
Larry Essary
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Jeff Chaffin
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.49
David McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.42
John Gouveia
published
3.26
Bill Green
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David McNeill + Larry Essary81146% games−9.5% vs expected
Jeff Chaffin + Larry Essary61145% games−11.6% vs expected
David McNeill + Jeff Chaffin6651% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cameron Burch
48W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.67
4
Larry Essary
110W–138L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Jeff Chaffin
77W–121L career · 11 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
David McNeill
104W–135L career · 10 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
John Gouveia
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.