Teams

Di.Adams18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-10vs Ka.Manooch18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Alicia Gilleskie6-1, 6-4
2024-05-03vs Ka.Blume18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Carol Abercrombie vs Elizabeth Thompson / Karen Blume7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-26vs Sa.Highsmith18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Flores / Ginger Scanlon vs Kristen Patch / Julie Shaw6-7, 4-6
2024-04-19vs As.Randall18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Carol Abercrombie vs Kathryn Hamrick / Lorna Hirsch6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Ashley Randall2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-05vs Ma.Gonella18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Emily Boyer6-0, 6-2
2024-03-15vs Ka.Blume18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesVeda Bynum / Ann Flores vs Karen Blume / Elizabeth Thompson4-6, 2-6
2024-03-08vs Sa.Highsmith18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Carrie Russell vs Sally Highsmith / Christina Allen - (DQ)2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCarol Abercrombie vs Kristen Patch2-6, 3-6
2024-03-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Clark / Veda Bynum vs Sarah Hill / Stephanie Burke6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Carrie Russell
published 3.5
2.76
Ginger Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.58
Carol Abercrombie
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.46
Michele Lee
published
2.40
Ann Flores
published 2.5
2.36
Veda Bynum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.30
Krissy Caro
published
2.00
Terry Marcott
published
Kristine Arora
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Abercrombie + Ginger Scanlon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Russell
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Ginger Scanlon
65W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Carol Abercrombie
66W–82L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
Michele Lee
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Ann Flores
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Veda Bynum
44W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
Krissy Caro
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.30
Terry Marcott
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kristine Arora
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.