Teams

LRC-Litch-Fynboe

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Charlie Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Pete Addison
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2024-09-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Ronald Nilsen vs Charles Stewart / Mitchell Whitehurst6-2, 6-0
2024-09-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesClemente Villalobos / Pete Addison vs Jim Kuoni / Robert Hollingsworth6-2, 7-5
2024-09-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Clemente Villalobos vs Mark Sinkey / William Chapman7-6, 6-2
2024-03-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Whittaker / Pete Addison vs Matthew Harris / Winferd Baker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPete Addison / Mark Hayter vs Roan Blacker / Mark Alderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesPete Addison / Thomas Reber vs Steve Hutchins / Robert Johnston6-2, 6-3
2023-10-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPete Addison / Mark Hayter vs Richard Graham / Joel Peyton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Charlie Hyde
28W–31L career
4%95%1%
3.22
3.5
Pete Addison
77W–96L career
2%98%0%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.