Teams

RTC BIGBY***

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.0 Men

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Saturday 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Matt Chehab
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Brian Ownby
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Adam Rizzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Landon Love
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Michael Love
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Barry Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Rick Meisel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Otis Kue
published
3.34
Leo Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Sean McPherson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
John Spann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
George Hardwick
published
2.98
Robert Germany
published
2.82
Kermit Gable
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
John Salvesen
published
2.73
Dean Hinnen
published 3
2.73
David Dye
published 3
2.58
Carlton Bigby
published 3
Kerry Keener
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Love + Rick Meisel224 matchesnot enough data
Matt Chehab + Landon Love404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Chehab
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Brian Ownby
37W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Adam Rizzo
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Landon Love
29W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Michael Love
26W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Barry Christensen
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Rick Meisel
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Otis Kue
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Leo Moore
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Sean McPherson
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
John Spann
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
George Hardwick
22W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Robert Germany
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kermit Gable
11W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
John Salvesen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Dean Hinnen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
David Dye
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Carlton Bigby
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Kerry Keener
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.