Teams

Morris/Griffith

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-08vs HuntingtonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRomina Averza / Beth Slomine vs Jill Huntington / Anne Schaefer2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLiz Macdonald / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Karen Adriani / Sonia Roy6-2, 6-3
2026-08-01vs WoffordWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Macdonald / Linda Harrell vs Bonnie Cecil / Cynthia Wofford2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Jessica Gibson vs Sandra Julian / Kelly Swartout7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Herman / Rosemary Harty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-23vs WoffordLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Piasecki / Melissa Thomas vs Kathy Coyle / Bonnie Cecil2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Theresa Coufal vs Wendy Hubbert / Rebecca Pugh1-6, 0-6
2026-06-18vs WoffordLost 12
L#1 DoublesTheresa Coufal / Rosemary Harty vs Victoria Ehly / Karin Mottus3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Betsy Morris vs Julie Anderson / Rebecca Pugh6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Virginia Haley vs Susan Koepp / Michelle O'Brien2-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs HuntingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Coufal / Liz Macdonald vs Patricia Lopez / Marilyn Moore5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Gibson / Kim Herman vs Stephanie Ruskin / DIANE CASANOVA1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Rosemary Harty vs Anne Schaefer / Yulin Henry1-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs WoffordLost 12
W#1 DoublesRomina Averza / Theresa Coufal vs Bonnie Cecil / Karin Mottus7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Kim Piasecki vs Cynthia Wofford / Michelle O'Brien1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Macdonald / Jessica Gibson vs Victoria Ehly / Susan Koepp2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs HuntingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Harty / Jessica Gibson vs Jill Huntington / DIANE CASANOVA1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Beth Slomine vs Yulin Henry / Marilyn Moore1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Herman / Theresa Coufal vs JENNIFER JOY / Martha Whitty0-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs WoffordLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Piasecki / Beth Slomine vs Bonnie Cecil / Cynthia Wofford4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Theresa Coufal vs Kathy Coyle / Karin Mottus1-6, 2-6
2026-05-04vs HuntingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Morris / Liz Macdonald vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Lori Trull3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Harrell / Kim Herman vs DIANE CASANOVA / Patricia Lopez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRomina Averza / Virginia Haley vs Jennifer Riedinger / Anne Schaefer2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Huntington9024310138
2Morris/Griffith1852246299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Beth Slomine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Liz Macdonald
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Rosemary Harty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Linda Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Romina Averza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Kim Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Kim Piasecki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Theresa Coufal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Betsy Morris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jessica Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Virginia Haley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Slomine + Romina Averza1637% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Slomine
39W–98L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
Liz Macdonald
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Rosemary Harty
68W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Romina Averza
30W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Kim Herman
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Kim Piasecki
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Theresa Coufal
24W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
38W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Jessica Gibson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Virginia Haley
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.