Teams

2*KMasood-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-24vs 5*KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Ana Goodwin6-2, 6-3
2024-07-17vs 1*KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#2 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Berna Tareen7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Elizabeth Chan3-6, 1-6
2024-06-26vs 3*KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#3 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Jeannette Brown3-6, 3-6
2024-06-19vs 4*MLong-EnoLost 02
L#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Madison Collier1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Sara Lawrence6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-17vs 5*KMcWhorter-HVCCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Kim McWhorter0-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Cecily Peterson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs 1*KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Megan Chiles1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Berna Tareen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs 3*KGreen-EnoSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Shelly Guo4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Joy Oh7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.62
Abby Olmsted
published 3.5
3.36
Valerie Wallace
published
3.18
Kathryn Howington
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Elyssa Millard
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Katie Masood
published
2.93
Katherine Beall
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyssa Millard + Kathryn Howington0529% gamesnot enough data
Elyssa Millard + Katherine Beall404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.97
3.5
Abby Olmsted
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
Valerie Wallace
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Kathryn Howington
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Elyssa Millard
65W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Katie Masood
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Katherine Beall
50W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.