Teams

Sunpro-Ellis

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 4.5M Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 4.60 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs Eccles Tennis Center-BublikWon 21
L#1 DoublesRoyce Plowman / Parker Hopkin vs Greg Maxwell / Dheven Duenwald2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Lundberg / Timothy Nefdt vs Ben Schenck / Dylan Wilde6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLevi Garnett / Kael Bybee vs Peter Bublik / Jamel Cash6-2, 6-4
2025-03-08vs Ivory Ridge-BecksteadWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Lundberg / Timothy Nefdt vs Austin Beckstead / Brayden Blodgett6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIsaac Smith / Jonas Kurihara vs Glen Zobell / Nate Goates6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSpencer Ellis / Kael Bybee vs Chris Bleak / Jacob DeRoest6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Eccles Tennis Center-BublikLost 12
W#1 DoublesMckay Luu / Eliott Moreno vs Jason Nielsen / Davis VanderVeen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoyce Plowman / Brad Nance vs Dylan Wilde / Dheven Duenwald1-3
L#3 DoublesIsaac Smith / John Hunter vs Jory Allred / Ben Schenck6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Wasatch Hills-ChengWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoyce Plowman / Isaac Smith vs Long Le / Kingsley Hoang7-6, 1-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Lundberg / Timothy Nefdt vs Don Pettigrew / Craig Rogowski6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKael Bybee / Levi Garnett vs Brady Rasmussen / Patrick Sheehan4-6, 1-6
2025-02-01vs Eccles Tennis Center-BublikWon 30
W#1 DoublesMckay Luu / Eliott Moreno vs Dheven Duenwald / Kyle Kugler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRoyce Plowman / Scott Hafen vs Peter Bublik / David Novom6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrad Nance / Jonas Kurihara vs Ben Schenck / Fred Heath6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Wasatch Hills-ChengSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMckay Luu / Eliott Moreno vs Adam Levenstein / Patrick Sheehan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIsaac Smith / Timothy Nefdt vs Curtis Sampson / Brian Schulz3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Michael Lundberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.61
Eliott Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.49
Isaac Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.46
Mckay Luu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Royce Plowman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.31
Timothy Nefdt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Brad Nance
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Bryan Lundberg
published 4.5
4.21
Jonas Kurihara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Spencer Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Kael Bybee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Kerry Perez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Levi Garnett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Parker Hopkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Hafen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Nefdt + Michael Lundberg11069% games+14.8% vs expected
Eliott Moreno + Mckay Luu10363% games+3.6% vs expected
Jonas Kurihara + Spencer Ellis404 matchesnot enough data
Eliott Moreno + Royce Plowman123 matchesnot enough data
Spencer Ellis + Royce Plowman303 matchesnot enough data
Royce Plowman + Scott Hafen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lundberg
28W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.63
5
Eliott Moreno
31W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.61
4.5
Isaac Smith
42W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
4.49
Mckay Luu
33W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
Royce Plowman
39W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
4.37
Timothy Nefdt
17W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Brad Nance
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bryan Lundberg
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonas Kurihara
26W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
Spencer Ellis
49W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
Kael Bybee
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Kerry Perez
35W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Levi Garnett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Parker Hopkin
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Hafen
33W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.