Teams

Nash/18's/2.5/SC Day

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Pou / Rachel Farrar vs Lindsey Matherne / Jamie Wynn0-6, 0-6
2026-03-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRachel Farrar / Katie Lindsay vs Jennifer Steen / Chelsea Clement5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesHope Riccobono / Katie Lindsay vs Jennifer Steen / Chelsea Clement4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-10Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ricotta / Rachel Farrar vs Lindsey Matherne / Elizabeth Klocek6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Pou / Katie Lindsay vs Jennifer Steen / Katie DiMaria6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Hope Riccobono
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Anna Pou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jessica Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kasey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Katie Lindsay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Nash
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Megan Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Ricotta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Farrar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Robin
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Hope Riccobono
8W–4L career · type S · 12 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Anna Pou
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jessica Hollister
18W–12L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kasey Moore
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Lindsay
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Nash
6W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Evans
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Ricotta
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Farrar
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Robin
8W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.