Teams

CM NAVY

2022 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-18vs CACM REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Michael Pardun vs Tony Chapin / David Duganne6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichael Donovan vs Jay Logan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Armatas / Christopher Hailes vs Michael Berman / John Anadiotis7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-10vs GPTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Michael Donovan vs Matthew Williams / Ankit Koul2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGeorge Armatas vs Shawn Blazer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Pardun / William Dickey vs Peter Sarnataro / Clark Sealy7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-09vs PRC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorge Armatas / Christopher Hailes vs Jeffrey Davis / Pat Conroy6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCraig Ricketts vs Alex Hmyrak2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Donovan / James Nottingham vs John Wierzba / TJ VanderHeiden5-7, 6-7
2022-04-02vs SKY REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Donovan / Michael Pardun vs Correy Jones / Ryan Goodale7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Hailes vs Kevin Fitzgerald6-3, 6-4
2022-03-19vs CP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Ricketts / William Dickey vs Gary Beck / Tony Gubenko7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGeorge Armatas vs Brian Fitzgerrell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Pardun / James Nottingham vs Christopher Ayala / Steve House6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Craig Ricketts
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Christopher Hailes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Michael Pardun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
James Nottingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
William Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Michael Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
George Armatas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Hailes + Craig Ricketts14358% games+16.4% vs expected
Michael Pardun + Christopher Hailes5266% games+8.9% vs expected
Michael Donovan + Michael Pardun3646% games−7.0% vs expected
Michael Donovan + William Dickey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Ricketts
104W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
Christopher Hailes
113W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Michael Pardun
109W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
James Nottingham
3W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Dickey
28W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Michael Donovan
54W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
George Armatas
19W–31L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.