Teams

Christiansen: Non-Pickleballers

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-10vs Northern/Fermstad/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Miller / Arlen Stern vs Loren Provenzano / Adama Traore2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJustin Miller vs Brett Carlson2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBrian Dahlin / Arlen Stern vs Joab Salvador / Nicolei Nasrabadi6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHai Nguyen / Bob Christiansen vs Matthew Fling / Jeremy Iverson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRobert Logelin vs David Kanani6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNabeel Qazi / Ed Andrist vs Junkyu Kim / Daniel Hosker6-0, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Northern/Fermstad/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#2 SinglesJustin Miller vs Richard Dillman1-6, 2-6
2025-01-27vs ORCC- BenowitzWon 10
W#2 SinglesJustin Miller vs Alex Gustafson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJustin Miller vs Austin Choe3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJustin Miller vs Benjamin Canine6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Brian Dahlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Sae Yoon
published
3.55
Justin Miller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Todd Nissen
published
3.48
Arlen Stern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Scott Nelson
published
3.36
Niandong Liu
published
3.33
Nabeel Qazi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Bob Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Robert Logelin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Ed Andrist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
ALTAF SHAIK
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sae Yoon + Scott Nelson6263% games+10.2% vs expected
Brian Dahlin + Todd Nissen24567% games+7.9% vs expected
Todd Nissen + Scott Nelson4251% games+4.9% vs expected
Sae Yoon + Arlen Stern5166% games+4.3% vs expected
Brian Dahlin + Scott Nelson4356% gamesnot enough data
Bob Christiansen + Arlen Stern2452% gamesnot enough data
Niandong Liu + ALTAF SHAIK3259% gamesnot enough data
Niandong Liu + Robert Logelin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Dahlin
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Sae Yoon
40W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Justin Miller
34W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Todd Nissen
46W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Arlen Stern
31W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Scott Nelson
31W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Niandong Liu
54W–36L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Nabeel Qazi
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Bob Christiansen
40W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Robert Logelin
40W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ed Andrist
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
ALTAF SHAIK
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.