Teams

Sartwell

2025 Howard Adult 65 & Over · Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesRichard Anderson / Howard Staley vs Jacob Zylberberg / Ken Flower2-6, 4-6
2025-08-12vs Reuwer - HuntersWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Anderson / Howard Staley vs Dean Dubbe / William Bloomquist6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAl Baker / Michael Litzau vs Randall Scott / Thomas Price6-4, 6-4
2025-07-30vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Anderson / Andrew Mullins vs John Solberg / Stephen Haines6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesRichard Anderson / Howard Staley vs Francis Kreysa / Dan Hirschfeld6-7, 4-3
2025-07-18vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Anderson / Howard Staley vs Christopher Gaylor / Stephen Palm6-4, 5-2
2025-07-11vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Anderson / Howard Staley vs Michael Hansberry / Lyn Cutulle6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Anderson / Andrew Mullins vs Francis Kreysa / Greg Mulligan4-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs Reuwer - HuntersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrederick Becker / Howard Staley vs Bob Weickgenannt / Stephen Lee6-2, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAl Baker / Michael Litzau vs William Bloomquist / Donald Reuwer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Al Baker
published 4
3.33
Hemant Bhavsar
published 3.5
3.33
Frederick Becker
published 3.5
3.28
Andrew Mullins
published 3.5
3.27
Howard Staley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Homer Riggins
published 3.5
3.18
Michael Litzau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.12
Richard Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.72
Anthony Harold
published 3
Terry Kreis
published
Thomas Otto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Anderson + Howard Staley8753% gamesnot enough data
Homer Riggins + Thomas Otto6654% gamesnot enough data
Hemant Bhavsar + Frederick Becker5058% gamesnot enough data
Al Baker + Michael Litzau123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Al Baker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Hemant Bhavsar
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Frederick Becker
5W–0L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Mullins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Howard Staley
22W–43L career · type A · 12 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Homer Riggins
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Michael Litzau
129W–86L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Richard Anderson
40W–62L career · 10 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Anthony Harold
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Terry Kreis
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Otto
35W–39L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.