Teams

4 CCV Pahuja

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-10vs 5 LPC MorganWon 21
W#1 SinglesNoah Greenbaum vs Nicholas Arcaro6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRishi Pahuja vs Shom Paul1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRyan Grammer vs Emmit Wright6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNoah Greenbaum vs Edan Lyons4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHugo Peris vs Chris Gaines3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRyan Grammer vs Chris Armstrong6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-01vs 2 Hermitage AdamsLost 12
L#1 SinglesHugo Peris vs Tyler Agee3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRishi Pahuja vs Jr Joyce5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Taliaferro vs Joel McClellan7-6, 6-4
2025-10-04vs 9 Westwood SnyderLost 02
L#1 SinglesRishi Pahuja vs Michael Creager0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Taliaferro vs John Weiland3-6, 3-6
2025-10-01vs 7 Westwood WestWon 21
W#1 SinglesNoah Greenbaum vs Bryce Madden6-0, 7-6
L#2 SinglesRishi Pahuja vs Brian Kusiak3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Taliaferro vs Zakk Lefkowits6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Spotty Robins
published
2.97
Ryan Grammer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Noah Greenbaum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Michael Taliaferro
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Rishi Pahuja
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Hugo Peris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Joseph Lawson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rishi Pahuja + Michael Taliaferro5158% games+2.3% vs expected
Rishi Pahuja + Noah Greenbaum303 matchesnot enough data
Noah Greenbaum + Ryan Grammer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Spotty Robins
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Ryan Grammer
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Noah Greenbaum
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Michael Taliaferro
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Rishi Pahuja
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Hugo Peris
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Lawson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.