Teams

SBTC-Slammers

Mixed Doubles 40 and Over - SB · SB 8.0 Combo

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs SB-LLW-Mix to the Max-Lisa FaitellLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Jakobson / Amy Jakobson vs John Chilcott / Lisa Faitell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-17vs Pershing-Happy MixedLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Jakobson / Amy Jakobson vs Ayesha Rooroh / Gary Clark4-6, 3-6
2023-06-03vs LCCC-Ya Wouldn't Wanna Be YaWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Jakobson / Amy Jakobson vs Brian Bokman / Dawn Bokman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-28vs LCCC-Ya Wouldn't Wanna Be YaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Thomas Jakobson vs Cynthia Frohling / Carl Steffens5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJill Sagner / Wesley Meyer vs Sheri Copus / Jim Copus1-6, 3-6
2023-05-20vs Pershing-Happy MixedLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Jakobson / Amy Jakobson vs Beverly Aronson / Gary Clark2-6, 5-7
2023-04-29vs Pershing-Happy MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Thomas Jakobson vs Beverly Aronson / Benedictus Tumbel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB 8.0 Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Nathalie Thurman
published
3.96
Millie Tadewaldt
published
3.76
Jill Sagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Gordon Ewing
published 4
3.69
Thomas Jakobson
published
3.61
Tara Frimat
published
3.48
James Brewer
published 4
Ben Levi
published 3.5
Brady Thurman
published 3.5
3.21
Amy Jakobson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Julie Rosenthal
published
Wesley Meyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Rosenthal + James Brewer6547% games+7.6% vs expected
Amy Jakobson + Thomas Jakobson51143% games−0.8% vs expected
Nathalie Thurman + Brady Thurman6356% gamesnot enough data
Millie Tadewaldt + Ben Levi1532% gamesnot enough data
Julie Rosenthal + Gordon Ewing033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathalie Thurman
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.21
Millie Tadewaldt
35W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Jill Sagner
43W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gordon Ewing
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Thomas Jakobson
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.69
Tara Frimat
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
James Brewer
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ben Levi
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brady Thurman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Amy Jakobson
42W–85L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Julie Rosenthal
33W–59L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Wesley Meyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.