Teams

MCTA55/Han/RHTC

Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-11vs MCTA55/Martin/RHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoy Landesman / Sandra Stowe vs Tisa Mullis / Nicole Morgan2-1
L#2 DoublesAlberta McCullough / Christine Schatt vs Lizette Conover / Shelly Steffey1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Wenzel / Sherry McCoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-28vs MCTA (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (PopeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMildred Deely / Lina Mazigi vs Kristen Unterberg / Bonnie Champion2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYin Han / Kim Thomas vs Kristine Predmore / Paula Greiner5-7, 1-6
2026-03-21vs MCTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Bloomberg)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesYin Han / Christine Schatt vs Ellen Archer / Teresa Rhyne4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlberta McCullough / Sandra Stowe vs Erin Bloomberg / Judith Skelton2-6, 0-6
2026-03-14vs MCTA55/Martin/RHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Stowe / Joy Landesman vs Pauline Styers / Sherry Teat6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlberta McCullough / Mildred Deely vs Julie Benton / Nicole Morgan2-6, 2-6
2026-03-07vs MCTA (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (PopeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMildred Deely / Lina Mazigi vs Kristine Predmore / Donna Musante5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEvelyn Wenzel / Alberta McCullough vs Jill Carnahan / Kristen Unterberg6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-21vs MCTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Bloomberg)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy Landesman / Sandra Stowe vs Lydia Schoeck / Marianne Keaton3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYin Han / Kim Thomas vs Sarah Asby / Madeleine Glover0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Joy Landesman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lina Mazigi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Mildred Deely
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Evelyn Wenzel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Alberta McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Yin Han
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Stowe
published
Sherry McCoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Mazigi + Mildred Deely2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Landesman
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Lina Mazigi
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Mildred Deely
78W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Evelyn Wenzel
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Alberta McCullough
3W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Yin Han
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Sandra Stowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sherry McCoy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.