← Teams

INDEP-Leahy

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Devoe
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.06
Stacy Hawkins Parker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.95
Amy Leahy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.85
Janet Tabor
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Results14 ties
2020-02-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMary Anderson / Janet Tabor vs Carol Levine / Sherwood Daniels7-6, 6-3
2020-02-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMary Anderson / Janet Tabor vs Laura Fuller / Leila Rowan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2020-02-08Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJanet Tabor / Susan Morrison vs Barbara Starnes / Emily Swenson6-2, 6-1
2020-02-07Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMary Anderson / Janet Tabor vs Christa Townsend / Carolyn Clark6-0, 6-2
2020-02-07Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMary Anderson / Janet Tabor vs Susan Ellison / Marianne Saibara6-0, 6-2
2018-11-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Amy Leahy vs Sandy Garry / June Wu6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Jennifer Devoe vs Carol Woolman / Tami Oglesby6-0, 6-4
2018-11-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Becky Rey / Teresa Neal6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Mary Anderson vs Deborah Borchers / Patricia Evola6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanet Tabor / Andrea Bowen vs Yumiko Pike / Gale Volk6-3, 6-3
2018-11-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJanet Tabor / Mary Anderson vs Heidi Wilcox / Michelle Day-Wirth6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Deborah Borchers / Teresa Neal6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLori Layne / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Yumiko Pike / Becky Rey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2018-11-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSue Gregoire / Andrea Bowen vs Lisa Lynch / Janet Walker6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Tracy Bardell / Jill Lee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanet Tabor / Sara Salvi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Leahy / Sue Gregoire vs Kim Hill / Carol Woolman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Bonnie Sidoff / Tami Oglesby7-6, 6-3
2018-10-06Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAmy Leahy / Elise Orban vs Amy Alpern / Lisa Lyon6-3, 6-4
2018-09-30Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSue Gregoire / Mary Anderson vs Becky Rey / Gale Volk6-2, 6-3
2018-09-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Leahy / Mary Kurz vs Lisa Lynch / Jana Corder6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Gay Hart vs Janelle Laurila / Jill Lee6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Lori Layne vs Jennifer Hill / Tracy Bardell6-2, 6-4
2018-09-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSue Gregoire / Mary Anderson vs Janine Paulson / June Wu6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Karen Mathews / Carol Woolman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Leahy / Elise Orban vs Bonnie Sidoff / Kim Hill6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Jennifer Devoe
31W–20L career
12%86%1%
4.09
4.5
Stacy Hawkins Parker
58W–55L career
8%92%0%
4.06
4.5
Amy Leahy
73W–57L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4.5
Janet Tabor
51W–28L career
52%48%0%
3.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.