Teams

Treviso Bay - Cape

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-02-25vs Pelican Marsh - EldredgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Constance Cape vs Fiona Prentice / Kimberly Taylor3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-02-18vs Sterling Oaks - GouldWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Janet Ellis vs Amy McHale / Fran Goodrow6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnie Mosbaugh / Joan Barrett vs Deborah Norton / Susan Portscher6-3, 6-3
2021-02-04vs Pelican Bay - A. BrooksWon 10
W#1 DoublesConstance Cape / Joan Barrett vs Maureen Parkinson / Susan Muth6-4, 6-2
2021-01-28vs Flight winners- Talis Park - HaasLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Joan Barrett vs Jacqui ONeal Privitere / Eileen Hung6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-01-21vs Players Club - KropkoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Janet Ellis vs Jayne Deyarmond / Sheryl Gebhart6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDarlene Carpenter / Kristine Bergenheim vs Lisa McNichol / Pennae Fawcett6-2, 7-6
2021-01-14vs Esplanade - L. GorskiWon 20
W#2 DoublesDeborah Paller / Joan Barrett vs Alice Meyer / Lynne Gorski7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Terina Korda vs Joan Sanders / Leslie Stone7-6, 6-4
2021-01-07vs Marco YMCA - AdlyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Constance Cape vs Peggy Chandler / Lauren Hattenbach6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Joan Barrett
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.19
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Darlene Carpenter
published 3.5
Constance Cape
published
Janet Ellis
published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Rogers + Janet Ellis4353% gamesnot enough data
Joan Barrett + Caroline Rogers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Joan Barrett
159W–116L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Darlene Carpenter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Constance Cape
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Ellis
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.