Teams

GEPTA/40&over/3.5W/Gonzalez/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Dinorah Martel
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 3.5
3.28
Blanca Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3.5
3.25
Estela Abelleira
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.19
Ana Dominguez
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.16
Cecilia Trejo
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.07
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
2.90
Concepcion Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.83
Ada Castro
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
MariCruz Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Maria Vazquez de Medina
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Mayela Baca
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Natalia Castaneda
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Renee Aguilar
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Stephanie Abelleyra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Concepcion Bueno + Blanca Olmos11264% games+0.5% vs expected
Ana Dominguez + Estela Abelleira12658% gamesnot enough data
Estela Abelleira + Blanca Olmos9858% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Blanca Olmos8757% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Blanca Olmos4744% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Maria Vazquez de Medina3642% gamesnot enough data
Ada Castro + Dolly Ricks3641% gamesnot enough data
Dinorah Martel + Ana Dominguez3542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dinorah Martel
19W–30L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Blanca Olmos
95W–73L career · 44 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Estela Abelleira
39W–43L career · 26 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ana Dominguez
48W–51L career · 33 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cecilia Trejo
34W–28L career · 23 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Dolly Ricks
58W–73L career · 22 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Concepcion Bueno
64W–27L career · 29 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Ada Castro
33W–36L career · 24 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
MariCruz Delgado
27W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Vazquez de Medina
24W–44L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mayela Baca
19W–9L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalia Castaneda
39W–28L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Aguilar
36W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Abelleyra
12W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.