Teams

OP-Pier/Alf Aces (55s 7.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 13 4:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Sep 15 11:00 AM
Emerald Golf Club
Oct 11 4:00 PM
Ole Porte Racquet Club
2026-09-01vs EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Easley / Cheryl Watson vs Catherine Land / Monica Carlson1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKim Alford / Sandy Phillips vs Rachel Smith / Catherine Hadad7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarsha Pierson / Debra Johann vs Doreen Hyet / Susan Moore6-0, 7-5
2026-09-01vs EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Henderson / Lynn Easley vs Lisa Zurawski / Catherine Hadad6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandy Phillips / Leone Gravelin vs Luann Scruggs / Ann Game6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Alford / Mariana Goldstein vs Doreen Hyet / Susan Moore6-3
2026-08-11vs EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Henderson / Lynn Easley vs Catherine Land / Diane Pons6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuby Williams / Debra Johann vs Catherine Hadad / Lisa Zurawski1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Mariana Goldstein vs Rachel Smith / Ann Game6-3, 6-4
2026-08-09vs GR-Taylor (55s 7.5W)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRuby Williams / Leone Gravelin vs Sheryletta Lacewell / Susan Johnson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Alford / Sandy Phillips vs Cynthia Jones / Jeanette Sasser6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Henderson / Mariana Goldstein vs Sherry Smith / Kelly Whitley5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55s 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Taylor (55s 7.5W)1142550
2EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)1133751
3OP-Pier/Alf Aces (55s 7.5W)1124861

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Ann Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Marsha Pierson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Kim Alford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Lynn Easley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Sandy Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Debra Johann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Mariana Goldstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leone Gravelin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Easley + Sandy Phillips9166% games+6.9% vs expected
Kim Alford + Sandy Phillips2545% games−2.8% vs expected
Sandy Phillips + Mariana Goldstein404 matchesnot enough data
Debra Johann + Mariana Goldstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Henderson
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Marsha Pierson
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kim Alford
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lynn Easley
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Sandy Phillips
46W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Debra Johann
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Mariana Goldstein
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Leone Gravelin
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.