Teams

Team 3 District Aces

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-23vs Team 4 RacqueteersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Ramseur / Robert Wagoner vs Samuel Payne / Fuhua Huang6-3, 6-3
2025-07-20vs Team 5 RBGCC Summer 25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJonathan Ramseur vs Scott Whittaker3-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs Team 1 Who Is We? EvolutionWon 10
W#1 DoublesSTEPHEN ROMIG / Jonathan Ramseur vs Ethan Cebulash / SHANE MURRAY6-3, 6-3
2025-07-02vs Team 8 Lord of the StringsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Laursen / Jonathan Ramseur vs Troy Davig / Samuel Ryan6-4, 6-2
2025-06-28vs Team 6 Serve-AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSoumya Dey / Jonathan Ramseur vs Jeffrey Gill / Zachary Zurich2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Laursen / Jonathan Ramseur vs William Hancock / Joe Napolitano4-6, 4-5
2025-06-02vs Team 7 Courtmasters PiF SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSTEPHEN ROMIG / Jonathan Ramseur vs John Williamson / Keenan Keeling4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Daniel Laursen
published 3.5
3.37
Jonathan Ramseur
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.17
Robert Wagoner
published
3.08
Jeremy Symons
published
3.03
Soumya Dey
published
2.99
STEPHEN ROMIG
published
2.96
James Knowles
published 3
2.92
Lawrence Eng
published
2.61
Ando Shin
published 3
Jarrett Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Ramseur + Daniel Laursen224 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Symons + Robert Wagoner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Laursen
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jonathan Ramseur
36W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Robert Wagoner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Jeremy Symons
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Soumya Dey
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
STEPHEN ROMIG
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
James Knowles
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Lawrence Eng
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Ando Shin
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jarrett Ray
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.