Teams

CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Hays (IHP)

Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indy Adult Combo 8.5 Men, S

14 players · average NTRP 4.29 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Jason Hays vs Marius Schmitt / Joe Bauer7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNick Batuello / Brady Wagenknecht vs Anthony Batuello / Jackson Barrett1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Airgood / Kris Ransberger vs Jay Wetzel / Daniel Stoddard7-5, 2-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChristopher Sears / Todd Meeks vs Solomon Lee / Joseph Miles6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTyler Hornback / Michael Trammel vs Jeff Springer / Desmond Wah6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Redding / Jason Hays vs David Kupinski / John Cox6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Andrew Airgood vs Eric Murphy / Kurt Langdon6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNick Batuello / Austin Crawford vs Joshua Spindler / Jose Lazaro Weiss3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJason Denton / Todd Meeks vs Justin Smith / Carlos Spencer6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Hays / Nick Batuello vs David Chader / Matthew Gardlik6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAvery Schmidt / Christopher Sears vs Paul Musson / Paul Podgorny6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesJason Hays / Jason Denton vs John Cox / Jeff Springer6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Trammel / Tyler Hornback vs David Kupinski / Desmond Wah4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKris Ransberger / Andrew Redding vs Simon Lee / Josh Husmann6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRyan Jamieson / Todd Meeks vs Jaxon Montague / Dax Lowery2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Redding / Andrew Airgood vs Alex Mullet / Arjun Bhalla6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristopher Sears / Avery Schmidt vs Landon Shell / Blake Ellis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRyan Jamieson / Todd Meeks vs Anthony Batuello / Jay Wetzel6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Denton / Andrew Airgood vs Daniel Stoddard / Steven Kim6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNick Batuello / Brady Wagenknecht vs Praveen Perni / Victor Suarez7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CIN Indy Adult Combo 8.5 Men, S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Hays (IHP)7017414156
2CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Dang (IRC-D)5212919164
3CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Lee (CRC)34111022185
4CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Wells (IRC-D)3491226208
5CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Alvarez (IRC-D)2581328204
6CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 M, Shippy (JCC)1661531224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Jason Denton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Andrew Airgood
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Nick Batuello
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Tyler Hornback
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Christopher Sears
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Andrew Redding
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Austin Crawford
published 4
3.75
Brady Wagenknecht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Jason Hays
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Avery Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Kris Ransberger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Todd Meeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Trammel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Jamieson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brady Wagenknecht + Jason Hays16266% games+9.1% vs expected
Christopher Sears + Avery Schmidt5454% games+4.0% vs expected
Brady Wagenknecht + Nick Batuello3449% games−3.3% vs expected
Nick Batuello + Jason Hays6354% games−3.9% vs expected
Tyler Hornback + Michael Trammel6751% gamesnot enough data
Austin Crawford + Avery Schmidt4450% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Redding + Brady Wagenknecht2643% gamesnot enough data
Tyler Hornback + Andrew Airgood6159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Denton
115W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.37
4.5
Andrew Airgood
128W–36L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Nick Batuello
75W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Tyler Hornback
64W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christopher Sears
63W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Andrew Redding
119W–138L career · 9 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
4
Austin Crawford
17W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brady Wagenknecht
109W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jason Hays
85W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Avery Schmidt
34W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Kris Ransberger
114W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Todd Meeks
78W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Michael Trammel
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Jamieson
38W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.