Teams

Hermitage Fisher

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-30vs CCV WherryLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Furbee / Andrew Bolyard vs Al Strickler III / Russ Bencks6-7, 4-6
2024-05-23vs SCC RiehmLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Daniel Sadusky vs Colin Blair / Thomas Ager1-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs Willow Oaks DuntonWon 10
W#2 DoublesPhilip Rackliffe / Andrew Bolyard vs Keyur Shah / Scott Boyle6-2, 6-3
2024-05-09vs Avalon McCarty LitesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDouglas Gray / Andrew Bolyard vs Tejas Raval / George Brickley2-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs Westwood Frank N MoleWon 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Hamant / Todd Furbee vs Shailesh Khatri / Michael Fanelli6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Sadusky / Andrew Bolyard vs Dave Mulholland / Carter Slough4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-18vs ACAC BardaroWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Furbee / Bart Nasta vs Ryan Bardaro / Josh Cohen6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Todd Furbee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.67
Bryan Fisher
published 4
3.62
Kurt Williams
published
3.62
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.61
Bart Nasta
published 4
3.60
Steve Hamant
published
3.35
Andrew Bolyard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Douglas Gray
published 3.5
3.08
YOUNG CHOE
published
Paul Kelly
published
Philip Rackliffe
published
Wood Gyory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Todd Furbee
72W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Kurt Williams
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Bart Nasta
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Steve Hamant
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Andrew Bolyard
126W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Douglas Gray
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
YOUNG CHOE
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Paul Kelly
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Rackliffe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wood Gyory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.