Teams

Farren-Le/Chattanooga

2026 Mixed Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-02vs Phillips/ChattanoogaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMy Le / Urooj Wali vs Diane Hardin / David Gardner6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNelu Farren / Shaun Olsen vs Janet Lawrence / Glen Urey6-4, 7-5
2026-08-01vs Phillips/ChattanoogaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Neely / Carter Black vs Dominique Muhlada / Matt Muhlada3-6, 1-6
2026-07-26vs Phillips/ChattanoogaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarter Black / Nelu Farren vs David Gardner / Janet Lawrence6-4, 6-3
2026-07-11vs Phillips/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesSean Phillips / Nelu Farren vs David Gardner / Mary Miller5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarter Black / Mary Neely vs Glen Urey / Ann Carroll6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMy Le / Urooj Wali vs Lee Carroll / Diane Hardin6-1, 6-2
2026-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesShaun Olsen / Terina Hullender vs David Gardner / Mary Miller7-5, 6-2
2026-06-20vs Phillips/ChattanoogaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMy Le / Nelu Farren vs Glen Urey / Ann Carroll6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Farren-Le/Chattanooga3310818163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Nelu Farren
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Carter Black
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Courtney Glass
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Mary Neely
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Urooj Wali
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
My Le
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lan Le
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shaun Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Terina Hullender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

My Le + Urooj Wali303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelu Farren
19W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Carter Black
7W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Courtney Glass
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Mary Neely
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
Urooj Wali
39W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
My Le
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lan Le
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shaun Olsen
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terina Hullender
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.