Teams

Sisco/Benton/Rebs

2026 Mixed 40 & Over 3.0, 4.0 · 3.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-25vs Gardner/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandi Watts / Jeffrey Fratesi vs Beto Cordova / Stephanie Byers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd vs Scott Doose / Jessica Doose6-1, 6-4
2026-07-15vs Gardner/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrant Morshedi / Regina Maher vs Ryan Allmond / Yan Sun7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd vs Jessica Doose / Kevin Keathley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDean Worley / Elizabeth Cook vs Jason Stone / Betsy Peeler6-2, 6-0
2026-07-14vs Brown/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrant Morshedi / Regina Maher vs Kharyssa Brown / Michael Brooks6-3, 6-5
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rainey / Casey Lozada vs Orena McClendon / Mark Caruthers3-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBrice Sisco / Brandi Watts vs Bud Watts / Camille Davis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Wittenberg/LR/PVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd vs Lindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDean Worley / Brandi Watts vs Bethany Jennings / Chris Jennings6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCasey Lozada / Sean Massey vs Carey Norris / Cheryl Norris6-0, 6-2
2026-07-07vs Junior/Ballard/LR/OCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSean Massey / Regina Maher vs Douglas Yee / Carole George6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBrice Sisco / Jo Margaret Bennett vs Doug Williams / Rebecca Foster6-3, 5-4
2026-06-29vs Brown/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd vs Jess Griffin / Lydia Hunjan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cook / Dean Worley vs Joshua de la Cruz / Orena McClendon6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKara Bloomfield / Jeffrey Fratesi vs Michael Brooks / Kharyssa Brown2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-09vs Wittenberg/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKara Bloomfield / Grant Morshedi vs Lindsey Wittenberg / Andrew Adkins1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Karen Shepherd vs Cheryl Norris / Carey Norris6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrandi Watts / Jeffrey Fratesi vs Win Rockefeller / Annie Hogate6-2, 6-4
2026-06-03vs Garretson/Stevens/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesDean Worley / Jo Margaret Bennett vs Dallas Stevens / Julie Enderlin6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cook / Sean Massey vs Sara Koger / Chad Murry6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrice Sisco / Casey Lozada vs Wendie Weare / Jim Dobry6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sisco/Benton/Rebs802227114
2Gardner/LR/Rebs53131126213
3Garretson/Stevens/LR/BP2651940260
4Junior/Ballard/LR/OC1742041257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Regina Maher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Dean Worley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Kara Bloomfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Brandi Watts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Karen Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Brice Sisco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Grant Morshedi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sean Massey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Jo Margaret Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Jeffrey Fratesi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
George Rainey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Cook
published 3
2.74
Casey Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Michael Shepherd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Margaret Bennett + Dean Worley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Maher
59W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Dean Worley
57W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
Kara Bloomfield
35W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Brandi Watts
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Karen Shepherd
60W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Brice Sisco
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Grant Morshedi
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sean Massey
41W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Jo Margaret Bennett
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.84
Jeffrey Fratesi
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
George Rainey
22W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Cook
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Casey Lozada
22W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Michael Shepherd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.