GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Gonzalez/EPTC#2

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Lunghi/EPTC#1	0	0	0	0	0	0
2GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Ninkovich/TW	0	0	0	0	0	0
3GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Gonzalez/EPTC#2	0	0	0	0	0	0
4GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Ferris/EPTC#3	0	0	0	0	0	0
5GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Mayo/CCC	0	0	0	0	0	0
6GEPTA/55&over/6.0MX/Estrada/EPTC#4	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—

Antonio Marquez

published 3

2.11

Cecilia Delgado

usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5

—

Ellen Hughes

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Gerardo Gomez

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published —

—

Hector Montelongo

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Jorge Kareh

usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Laura Odell

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published —

—

Manny Casillas

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Mary Chavez

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published —

—

Michele Zerah

usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Patricia Arreola

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published —

—

Rosario Mendoza

usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Veronica Gonzalez

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published —

—

Yvonne Gomez

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonio Marquez + Jorge Kareh	5–2	53% games	+1.8% vs expected
Laura Odell + Patricia Arreola	2–4	40% games	not enough data
Hector Montelongo + Gerardo Gomez	4–2	55% games	not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez + Patricia Arreola	3–2	44% games	not enough data
Michele Zerah + Veronica Gonzalez	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Gerardo Gomez + Yvonne Gomez	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Antonio Marquez

25W–56L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

2.5

Cecilia Delgado

27W–43L career · 27 lines in 2026

0%>99%<1%

2.11

—

Ellen Hughes

74W–86L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Gerardo Gomez

52W–48L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Hector Montelongo

11W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jorge Kareh

67W–100L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Odell

50W–41L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Manny Casillas

12W–22L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mary Chavez

18W–14L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Michele Zerah

13W–43L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Patricia Arreola

45W–59L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rosario Mendoza

34W–41L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Veronica Gonzalez

48W–70L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yvonne Gomez

5W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.