Teams

Seminole Lake Dsa TriMix

2026 Pinellas Social TriMix Summer · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16vs RCSP Yilmaz TriMixLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesKevin Burnett / Lita Hollister vs Brian Stone / Shelly Watkins4-6, 5-7
2026-08-09vs RCSP Yilmaz TriMixSplit 11
W#2 Mixed DoublesKevin Burnett / Joan Whitten vs Davina Doletzky / Thomas Gross5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 Mixed DoublesKevin Dooling / Eileen Rodriguez vs Koray Yilmaz / Isabelle Conti4-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs RCSP Yilmaz TriMixLost 02
L#1 Mixed DoublesKevin Burnett / Joan Whitten vs Thomas Gross / Shelly Watkins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 Mixed DoublesJose Dsa / Lita Hollister vs Alan Chin / Cathrine Chin2-6
2026-07-12vs RCSP Yilmaz TriMixLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesKevin Burnett / Jessica Kuzio vs Brian Stone / Vera Dikmen3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCSP Yilmaz TriMix4110511127
2Seminole Lake Dsa TriMix0511429178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jose Jarabo
published 4
3.55
3.49
Joan Whitten
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Lita Hollister
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Jessica Kuzio
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jonathan Thompson
published
3.26
Kevin Dooling
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bruce Erbeck
published 3.5
3.19
Jose Dsa
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Winnelyn Humphrey
published
2.48
Heidy Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Kuzio + Jose Jarabo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jose Jarabo
112W–54L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Andres Rodrigues Mortimer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Joan Whitten
182W–137L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Lita Hollister
78W–113L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jessica Kuzio
52W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Jonathan Thompson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kevin Dooling
42W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Bruce Erbeck
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jose Dsa
121W–100L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Winnelyn Humphrey
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Heidy Rodriguez
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.