Teams

WH Spring Chicks - G. Tardy

2025 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-03vs Beerman Game, Set, Lunch - T. RitterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Rainer / Geraldine Tardy vs Clara Copley / Hetal Rajguru6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMandy Jarrett vs RICHELE FLOYD0-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs Polk/Marcewicz/40&Over3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Ann Rainer vs Anna Clark / Lauren Lloyd6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMandy Jarrett vs Jennifer Chevalier6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAnn Rainer / Geraldine Tardy vs Karen Hogg / Catherine Futch6-1, 6-1
2025-05-13vs Lakeland CC - Grieger/EvansWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Tardy / Ann Rainer vs Elizabeth Paul / Shannon Miles6-3, 6-3
2025-05-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesMandy Jarrett vs Stacey Osmon6-2, 6-0
2025-04-29vs WHCC Mid Court Crisis - J. HymanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Rainer / Geraldine Tardy vs Kathy Borders / Courtney McCrystal6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Laura Barben vs Sandra McWhorter / Christine Ingram6-3, 6-4
2025-04-22vs Polk/Marcewicz/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Laura Barben vs Anna Clark / Lauren Lloyd3-6, 1-6
2025-04-11vs Lakeland CC - Grieger/EvansSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Marilyn Richmond vs Courtney Larson / Amy Evans6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKim Schmucker / Geraldine Tardy vs Jane Phillips / Brandy Lansford6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Mandy Jarrett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Ann Rainer
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Geraldine Tardy
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.75
Marilyn Richmond
published
2.59
Laura Barben
published
2.55
Stephanie Barron
published
2.49
Kim Schmucker
published
2.14
Susan Cruze
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Tardy + Ann Rainer7458% games+7.8% vs expected
Geraldine Tardy + Mandy Jarrett4452% gamesnot enough data
Mandy Jarrett + Marilyn Richmond2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mandy Jarrett
73W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Ann Rainer
63W–103L career · 7 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Geraldine Tardy
102W–114L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Marilyn Richmond
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
Laura Barben
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
Stephanie Barron
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kim Schmucker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Susan Cruze
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.