Teams

Meadows Pink YaYas

2023 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall Women · 7.0 W Monday

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-05vs Payne Park LacroixWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Denise Harcke / Jean Lacroix6-0, 6-1
2022-11-21vs University Park BarryWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Karen Morgan / Ursula Ruckli6-0, 6-2
2022-11-14vs Landings AustgenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Beverly Austgen / Beth Cotner6-4, 6-4
2022-11-07vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Nancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoyce Ottinger / Karen Matthews vs Sue Guarasci / Carol Somers6-1, 6-4
2022-10-31vs Longwood HallWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Sigi Moriece / JoMarie Privitera6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Matthews / Joyce Ottinger vs Jill Bressler / Joan Hatch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-17vs University Park BarryWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Pamela Mathews / Dodie Shuert6-3, 6-1
2022-10-14vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Maureen Meaney / Patricia Cunningham6-0, 6-3
2022-10-10vs Landings AustgenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlice Levine / Donna Spielberger vs Beverly Austgen / Amy Grossman6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Alice Levine
published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Hynes
published 3.5
2.79
Becky Pomfret
published 3
Donna Spielberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Ottinger
published
Julie Harris
published
Karen Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Osborne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Spielberger + Alice Levine5162% gamesnot enough data
Becky Pomfret + Catherine Hynes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alice Levine
44W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Catherine Hynes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Becky Pomfret
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Donna Spielberger
50W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joyce Ottinger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Matthews
53W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Osborne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.