Teams

PTC RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-17vs VC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Snyder / Rachel Lyons vs Traci Samaras / Elizabeth Likovich1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaty Cafazza vs Kate Patton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Shader / Emily Ferguson vs Apryl Walker / Page Rollert6-3, 6-4
2024-07-10vs GCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Swanson / Stephanie Peacock vs Judith Pearson / Sonya Kubik6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaureen Radtke vs Alicia Sloan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hunt / Elizabeth Barnes vs Marissa Sproles / Ilana Larson2-6, 5-7
2024-07-03vs WP-G NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaty Cafazza / Rachel Lyons vs Meghan Rooney / Kristin Stefanatz6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Swanson vs Grace McLaughlin3-6, 2-6
2024-06-26vs DTP TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Stephanie Peacock vs Audrey Stokely / Milena Joy6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAshley Hunt vs Kimberlly Chhor6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Ruiz / Hayley Servatius vs Emily Kimpton / Natalie Levanway6-7, 1-6
2024-06-19vs CHCC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaty Cafazza / Stephanie Peacock vs Ashley Balakas / Jen de Loizaga6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Swanson vs Paige Reberry6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Evelyn Snyder vs Laura Koelbel / KIRSTEN SIMMONS6-2, 6-4
2024-06-12vs EM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Lyons / Stephanie Peacock vs Anne Kay / Emily Yates3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaty Cafazza vs Lindsay Hand3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Radtke / Ashley Hunt vs Katie Schaefer / Natalie Dean7-5, 6-4
2024-06-05vs WP-G GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarci Pisciotta / Rachel Lyons vs Jennifer Trusty / Jana Krohne6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKaty Cafazza vs Erin Schlosser4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Shader / Emily Ferguson vs Natalie Jacobsen / Emily Knight7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings109 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ NAVY701839126
2SS-LGT RED701749108
3CACM RED7016511116
4GCC RED7016511128
5RMTC RED7016514140
6RHCC GREEN611748105
7KC-RH NAVY6117411124
8KC-RH BLUE6115612142
9SS-LT NAVY6116513134
10RRTC NAVY6115614120
11SS-LT YELLOW6115616172
12VC GREEN6114717168
13DTP GREEN6114719159
14KC-CC GREEN5113511122
15HFII RED5112613109
16HV PURPLE5113513116
17SS-H YELLOW5112614133
18HRCA-N TEAL5111719148
19HRCA-N BLUE5216510113
20BCST RED5215612130
21BCC NAVY5216512122
22EM BLUE5215614171
23GAC RED5215614116
24SKY BLUE5214715134
25LEBTC BLUE5214717121
26CCC ORANGE5213818168
27NJ GREEN5213819164
28CHCC RED5213819163
29GAC NAVY5214719170
30MVCC GREEN5212920164
31WP-L RED5213820182
32BRMST NAVY5213821174
33HV ORANGE52111021177
34LEBTC RED4211716125
35KNO NAVY4211716134
36HV GREEN4210819159
37WC NAVY4210820147
38PRKR GREEN4313817146
39RHCC BLUE4312919155
40NJ TEAL4312919157
41MEA GREEN4313819178
42BCC GREEN4312919165
43GTC BLUE4312919175
44DTC BLUE4312919162
45DTP TEAL4312921167
46RCC BLUE43111021172
47WP-O BLUE4312921192
48HW GREEN43111022175
49BP ORANGE4312922173
50GAC GREEN43111023171
51PCC BLUE43101123165
52WP-G GREEN43111023175
53BCST BLUE43101124170
54CCC PINK43101124167
55SS-H TEAL43101125175
56HRCA-N GREEN3310818134
57BM RED339919161
58HW RED339920163
59HG GREEN339921158
60RCC GREEN34111022172
61GNO BLUE34111022152
62EM NAVY34101123192
63KC-CC RED34101123186
64PTC RED34111023179
65WP BLUE34101123180
66HG RED34111024158
67LAC BLUE34101124189
68CM GREEN34101125185
69PH GREEN34101125198
70WC GREEN3491225186
71WP-G NAVY3491225189
72CCV RED34101126199
73WP YELLOW3471430189
74RMTC GREEN3461531200
75TTA BLUE3461532218
76EM TEAL249922161
77WC RED2471123167
78FOX BLUE2461226169
79MC RED25101124183
80FOX RED2581326194
81RHCC RED2591226188
82CPV BLUE2581327184
83SKY RED2581328198
84VC BLUE2571428177
85DTP YELLOW2571428204
86HF YELLOW2571428201
87KC-CC TEAL2571428221
88BM GREEN2581330198
89NJ PURPLE2551634231
90HW BLUE1561225166
91GCC BLUE1561226170
92EM GREEN1551327187
93BRMST GREEN1671431218
94CVTA BLUE1661531222
95CVTA RED1661531208
96GR GREEN1661531204
97CM BLUE1661532225
98GR RED1661532221
99TTA RED1651633223
100VCC RED1651633226
101CCV GREEN0661225160
102SS-D PURPLE0611734211
103DTC RED0761531215
104VCC GREEN0741735219
105EM RED0731837235
106CCV BLUE0731837222
107CHCC NAVY0731837238
108HIW RED0721939245
109GR BLUE0712040242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Marci Pisciotta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Ashley Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Katy Cafazza
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.32
Emily Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Maureen Radtke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.24
Rachel Lyons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Alexandra Swanson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Evelyn Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.89
Katie Shader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Hayley Servatius
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jessica Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Peacock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Pisciotta + Katy Cafazza8070% games+13.4% vs expected
Rachel Lyons + Ashley Hunt4258% games+9.3% vs expected
Rachel Lyons + Katy Cafazza2356% games+8.5% vs expected
Katie Shader + Emily Ferguson2343% games+0.6% vs expected
Emily Ferguson + Maureen Radtke4447% games−1.5% vs expected
Rachel Lyons + Marci Pisciotta8650% games−1.8% vs expected
Evelyn Snyder + Hayley Servatius3638% games−4.6% vs expected
Katy Cafazza + Emily Ferguson1534% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marci Pisciotta
100W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Ashley Hunt
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Katy Cafazza
89W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Emily Ferguson
19W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.32
Maureen Radtke
32W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Rachel Lyons
32W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Alexandra Swanson
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Evelyn Snyder
47W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Katie Shader
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.89
2.5
Hayley Servatius
6W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Jessica Ruiz
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Peacock
9W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.