Teams

CANIHAN

2025 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Women 8.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-15vs GardnerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garner / Lee Ann Zierenberg vs Lynn Gore / Julie Cooke1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Canady / Darlene Satifka vs Barbara Taylor / Candy Garrett6-2, 6-2
2025-10-04vs GardnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesVeronica Canihan / Kathleen Timberlake vs Candy Garrett / Deedee Greene6-4, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Swagerty/HoltWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Julia Longfellow / Liz Coughlin6-3, 6-4
2025-09-22vs GardnerWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Medley / Elizabeth Palmer vs Barbara Taylor / Candy Garrett6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Canady / Darlene Satifka vs Lynn Gore / Debra Jones7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-17vs Swagerty/HoltLost 01
L#2 DoublesSonya Young / Kathleen Timberlake vs Loretta Lestrange / Lisa Phelps7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-06vs Swagerty/HoltLost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Canihan / Kathleen Timberlake vs Jennifer Adams / Julia Longfellow6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Carolyn Medley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Cheryl Canady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Sonya Young
published
3.92
Lee Ann Zierenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Karen Pennington
published
3.64
Darlene Satifka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Karen Fania
published
Veronica Canihan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pennington + Lee Ann Zierenberg213 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Canady + Veronica Canihan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolyn Medley
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Cheryl Canady
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Sonya Young
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Lee Ann Zierenberg
35W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Karen Pennington
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Darlene Satifka
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Karen Fania
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Canihan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.