Teams

Miles, Dianne

2023 Adult 55 & Over-JXN · Women 9.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Dawn Ledet
published 4
Dianne Miles
published 4
3.36
September Moore
published
Jane Kuebel
published
Kristine Ball
published
M Donna Leis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

M Donna Leis + Dianne Miles0515% gamesnot enough data
Jane Kuebel + Kristine Ball224 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Ledet + Jane Kuebel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Ledet
29W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Dianne Miles
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
September Moore
12W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Jane Kuebel
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Ball
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
M Donna Leis
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.