Teams

Biloxi - Mitchell

2026 Adult 18 & Over - GC · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-20vs Mitchell TOCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracey Mathews / Kelly Robinson vs Holly French / Lindsey OConnell1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSabine Pierre / JEN INMAN vs Tara Mitchell / Jaklyn Wrigley6-2, 6-0
2026-04-08vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 2.5 WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSabine Pierre / Jennifer Mitchell vs Elan Buckley / Jordan Herrington6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Blythe / Tracey Mathews vs Annabella Matthews / Donna Matthews6-4, 6-4
2026-03-31vs Mitchell TOCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Blythe / JEN INMAN vs Sarah Mitchener / Holly French6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTracey Mathews / Nicole Rivera vs Tara Mitchell / Jaklyn Wrigley6-7, 2-6
2026-03-23vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 2.5 WWon 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Purvis vs Joni Creel6-2, 6-4
2026-03-11vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 2.5 WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSabine Pierre / Kelly Robinson vs Courtney Zitterkopf / Ann Strange6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJEN INMAN / Tracey Mathews vs Donna Matthews / Annabella Matthews5-7, 4-6
2026-03-10vs Mitchell TOCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Robinson / JEN INMAN vs Katherine Swetman / Lindsey OConnell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Tracey Mathews vs Holly French / Michelle Smith6-2, 6-3
2026-02-23vs Mitchell TOCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Mathews / Lauren Purvis vs Katherine Swetman / Lindsey OConnell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Rivera / JEN INMAN vs Holly French / Michelle Smith3-6, 3-6
2026-02-09vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 2.5 WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSabine Pierre / Kelly Robinson vs Judi Thames / Jordan Herrington6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJEN INMAN / Nicole Rivera vs Tyler Ash / Marlo Stewart6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Biloxi - Mitchell5316817151
2BBTC-MATTHEWS 2.5 W1751938240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Sabine Pierre
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Lauren Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.40
Janet Blythe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
JEN INMAN
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.83
Tracey Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sabine Pierre
32W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Lauren Purvis
16W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
Janet Blythe
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
JEN INMAN
6W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Tracey Mathews
9W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.