Teams

SFT:Spark:Weatherwax

2023 EMA Tri Level · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-12vs NEW: You've Been Served:BloomLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatty Barry / Elizabeth Weatherwax vs Margot Bloom / Kirsten DeSalvo2-6, 4-6
2023-11-05vs NEW:Moodswings:HafeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEleni Zekirias / Emma DeFrancesco vs Jacqueline Bryan / Jeannine Zeller5-7, 6-5, 0-1
2023-10-29vs WIL:Willows:SwankLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatty Barry / Elizabeth Weatherwax vs Miao Gao / BING SHUAI1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-22vs NEW: You've Been Served:BloomWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmma DeFrancesco / Elizabeth Weatherwax vs Barbara Bailey / Stephanie MacBurnie6-4, 6-4
2023-10-15vs NEW:Moodswings:HafeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Weatherwax / Emma DeFrancesco vs Allison Bitter / Jeannine Zeller4-6, 6-5, 0-1
2023-10-01vs NEW: You've Been Served:BloomLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Weatherwax / Eleni Zekirias vs Barbara Bailey / Stephanie MacBurnie1-6, 0-6
2023-09-24vs NEW:Moodswings:HafeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma DeFrancesco / Eleni Zekirias vs Jacqueline Bryan / Amy Hafey1-6, 3-6
2023-09-17vs WIL:Willows:SwankWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatty Barry / Elizabeth Weatherwax vs Miao Gao / Mei Swank6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Elizabeth Weatherwax
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Eleni Zekirias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Emma DeFrancesco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Patty Barry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eleni Zekirias + Elizabeth Weatherwax4442% games+10.8% vs expected
Patty Barry + Eleni Zekirias134 matchesnot enough data
Patty Barry + Elizabeth Weatherwax134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Weatherwax
106W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Eleni Zekirias
58W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Emma DeFrancesco
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Patty Barry
126W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.