Teams

Court Warriors

2022 NOVA Singles Fall Women · NOVA Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-23vs Sassy SmashersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenni Bae vs Grace Becton7-6
L#2 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Natilee Festa1-6, 1-6
2022-10-16vs Tennis the MenaceWon 10
W#1 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Kristin Quackenbush6-0, 4-5
2022-10-09Won 10
W#3 SinglesWhitney Slahetka vs Wendy Li6-1, 6-3
2022-09-24vs Tennis the MenaceLost 01
L#1 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Kristin Quackenbush1-6, 0-6
2022-09-22vs Riverbend LadiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Melissa Laskin4-6, 3-4
W#2 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Laurie Bennett7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesWhitney Slahetka vs Kate Wesley2-6, 3-4
2022-09-18vs Sassy SmashersWon 21
W#1 SinglesJenni Bae vs Kristina Heino6-1, 4-5
L#2 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Stephanie Baione5-7, 3-0
W#3 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Nicola Murphy6-4, 4-3
2022-09-04vs In2win...we refuse to loseWon 20
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Alisha Kim6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesWhitney Slahetka vs Wendy Li6-4, 6-0
2022-08-18vs Riverbend LadiesWon 10
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Brenda Clark6-3, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.74
Jenni Bae
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.69
Cindy Mathys
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Dana Chladek
published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Whitney Slahetka
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Terry Cocozza
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mathys + Terry Cocozza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Jenni Bae
211W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cindy Mathys
98W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dana Chladek
166W–70L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Whitney Slahetka
93W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.