Teams

LLTC - Sets in the City

*2025 Houston Fall League (2024) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 4.5 Ladies

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-22vs MPTC - Stryke ForceWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Dudzinski / Rachel Howie vs Paige Hagle / Lisa Cohen6-0, 6-1
2024-10-15vs Pin OakWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Dudzinski / Rachel Howie vs Geraldine Haas / Laura Carter6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Rachel Howie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.07
Basia Walters
published 4
3.99
Stephanie Dudzinski
published
3.85
Leslie Mandeville
published
3.79
Kristin Barnes
published
Amanda Malinoff
published 4
3.72
Renata Neaton
published
3.67
Stefanie Carlson
published
3.59
Stephanie Rivera
published
3.59
Hannah Law
published
3.43
Yvonne Puente
published
3.42
Thy Regent
published
3.39
Stacy Tea
published
Emma Nguyen
published
Victoria Tran
published
ZHOU LIN
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Law + Stacy Tea3355% games+0.1% vs expected
Yvonne Puente + Renata Neaton5067% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Puente + Stacy Tea213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Howie + Stephanie Dudzinski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Howie
59W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.34
4
Basia Walters
30W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.07
Stephanie Dudzinski
58W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.99
Leslie Mandeville
66W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Kristin Barnes
37W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amanda Malinoff
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renata Neaton
92W–36L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Stefanie Carlson
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Stephanie Rivera
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
Hannah Law
56W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
Yvonne Puente
119W–68L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Thy Regent
22W–53L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Stacy Tea
68W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Emma Nguyen
43W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Tran
43W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
ZHOU LIN
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.