Teams

D.Brazee

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs S.Turnburke/DAbouriskSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Deborah Carrington vs Jamie Kerzner / Julie Lee2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Mahan / Jennifer McCown vs Alacia Billow / Aliza Bricklin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-24vs M.WittkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Carrington / Deborah Brazee vs Jennifer Tun / Margaret Wittke6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeslie Mahan / Jennifer McCown vs Lee Perry / Ginger Sidoti6-2, 6-3
2023-04-17vs A.AshburnWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Marjorie Cannity vs Luann Richardson / Jean Williams6-4, 6-1
2023-04-10vs T.LeFevre 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Deborah Carrington vs Sarah Bell / Martha Funsten6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim Gottshall / Leslie Mahan vs Gwen Noble / Christine Subasic3-6, 3-6
2023-03-31vs P.CochranLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Mahan / Lynn Woodard vs Kellie Snider / Linda Eskridge6-7, 4-6
2023-03-29vs A.Whitten/BMarchiLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Deborah Carrington vs Julie Fleming / Jane Hunter4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Mahan / Diane Williams vs Lori Hall / Noelle Schofield0-6, 2-6
2023-03-20vs B.KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Deborah Carrington vs Laurie Reiss / Theresa Rosario-Jansen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Mahan / Jennifer McCown vs Jorgelina Stroud / Stephanie Lee6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Deborah Brazee
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Leslie Mahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Jennifer McCown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Lynn Woodard
published
2.88
Kim Gottshall
published
2.53
Martha Herlihy
published
2.51
Jeannette Congdon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Mahan + Jennifer McCown314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Mahan + Deborah Brazee224 matchesnot enough data
Martha Herlihy + Jeannette Congdon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Brazee
114W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Leslie Mahan
60W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Jennifer McCown
67W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Lynn Woodard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.90
Kim Gottshall
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.88
Martha Herlihy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jeannette Congdon
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.